2/1/2024 0 Comments The red herring fallacy![]() If it weren't or if she were singing live you'd hear that she's out of tune. Glaucon: Whatev, her voice is auto-tuned. Her voice is a combination of Jesus and Fergie. Socrates: Rebecca Black is such a great singer. ![]() ![]() Lets look at an example from Plato's Republic: Its premises are irrelevant to the conclusion it seeks to negate/oppose. Basically, a red herring is an objection to a position that doesn't address the actual argument. Both fallacies can be either intentional or unintentional.Ī red herring is "an attempt to shift debate away from the issue that is the topic of an argument" (Groarke & Tindale p. They are the red herring and the straw man. There are many different types of fallacies but the two that we will look at here have to do with how premises relate to the context of an argument. Fallacies are intentional or unintentional (common) mistakes in argument. Now we're going to look at the dark side of arguments: fallacies. ![]() The concept of validity can be further sub-divided into two components: (i) premise relevance and (ii) premise sufficiency. So, whilst you are on the lookout for them in your opponent, make sure not to use them yourself.Ĭareer Development (40) Case Studies (16) Change Management (153) Communication (60) Continuous Improvement (252) Culture (40) Customer Relations (35) Digitalization (21) Digital Transformation (11) Education & Training (29) Emotional Intelligence (55) Entrepreneurship (70) ERP (14) Facilities Management (8) Finance (146) Globalization (27) Healthcare (32) High-Performance Organization (63) Human Resources (61) Information Technology (320) Innovation (148) Inventory Management (10) Leadership (250) Lean Six Sigma (146) Logistics (53) Manufacturing (56) Marketing (13) Mentorship (32) Monthly Newsletter (50) Operational Due Diligence (10) Organizational Design (107) Overall Equipment Effectiveness (8) Performance Management (75) Process Improvement (110) Project Management (24) Quality Management (40) Readiness & Resilience (19) Retail (8) Risk Management (93) Root Cause Analysis (23) Safety (13) Sales (46) Supply Chain (89) Trust Me.In the last post we looked at the properties of a strong argument: (a) premise acceptability and (b) logical force (i.e., validity). The person who engages in argument according to their (well thought-out) plan and maintains control of the narrative has the advantage.Īnd remember, using logical fallacies are a sign of weakness in the argument and the person invoking them. Get back on-point and on-track as quickly as possible. Be en-garde for such false arguments and, when encountered, parry and thrust. They are the entrances to rabbit-holes you want to avoid going down at all costs. When engaged in the actual argument, be on the look-out for these false arguments, these logical fallacies. Perhaps practice your debate with a friend or colleague who is a knowledgeable and credible adversary. Also be prepared for valid counter-arguments so that they may be engaged and overcome. Map-out how you will present your arguments so that they lead to the desired outcome and ensure that you have all the information necessary to support your arguments. Make sure that your desired outcome is simple and crystal clear. When preparing to argue, you must do the work. Or to loan Greece more money so they can use some of it to pay outstanding loans and some to pay government employees. Middle Ground is a form of argument that seeks a compromise and is usually invoked by the party with the weaker position.Īnd although compromise is almost always a reasonable goal, it is not always appropriate, attainable, or practical.įor instance, a half-truth is still a lie. And we know this because Mohammad Ali said so himself (that it was true in this particular case is not the point). To counter, you can’t attack the premise or the proof, but rather you have to attack the circular structure.įor example, we all know that the greatest boxer was Mohammad Ali. It is a rather incoherent argument which is falsely strong because it is circular. In reality, not many things (outside the formulas of science) are truly “black and white”, but are instead shades of gray (and there are more than 50 of them).Īn example might be “If you are for a strong defense, you must be against the poor” or “If you are against paying teachers more, then you must be against education.”īegging the Question is a circular form of argument in that the justification or “proof” in the validity of the argument is included in the premise of the argument. Black-or-White (or “False Choice”) is a form of argument most often used by propagandists and those who want to cause divisions and leverage extreme (and often unrelated) views.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |